What term is also known as Absolute Liability, based on the theory of making something safe that is inherently dangerous?

The term "Strict Torts" refers to a legal concept where a party can be held liable for their actions regardless of fault or intent, particularly in cases involving activities that are inherently dangerous. This principle is often applied in situations where the activity poses a significant risk of harm, and the law imposes a duty on the responsible parties to ensure that such activities are conducted safely.

In essence, under strict torts, a person or entity can be liable for damages caused by hazardous activities or defective products even if they exercised reasonable care or did not intend to cause harm. This notion aligns with the principle of Absolute Liability, which holds defendants fully responsible for the consequences of their actions without the necessity of proving negligence or intent.

By contrast, the other terms listed focus on different legal theories: Negligence involves proving that a party failed to act with reasonable care, Vicarious Liability involves a situation where one party is held liable for another's actions, and Product Liability pertains specifically to defective products causing harm. Understanding the distinction between these concepts clarifies why "Strict Torts" accurately captures the essence of being liable for inherently dangerous activities without regard for fault.